• Blog
  • About
Powered by Blogger.

Path to prosperity

With health-related concerns being brought to the forefront during the Covid-19 pandemic, investors could reasonably expect healthcare stocks to be performing well. However, I would like to highlight that not all healthcare stocks are doing well and it is important to select the right area of healthcare. In the chart below, SGX-listed hospital/clinic stocks have had an anaemic performance relative to expectations; most are trading flat or below their prices at the start of the year. In this post, I will address the initial expectations of outperformance and then explain why such stocks have failed to live up to expectations. 
Performance of hospital stocks (Source: Yahoo Finance)
Expected resilience of hospital/clinic stocks
Hospital or clinic related stocks are stocks that operate/own hospitals and typically benefit from a higher patient load or utilisation of their healthcare services. Demand for healthcare services tends to be inelastic and relatively recession-proof as the need to cure illness is usually not something patients can or would stinge on.

Falling short of expectations because...
1. Fewer people falling sick
As the world goes into lockdown (and Singapore into Circuit Breaker) and the majority of people stay home, the chances of catching an illness also go down. This is the intended effect of such a measure but it also has the side effect of lowering demand for healthcare services as people don't fall sick as often.

2. Self-medication
A message that is constantly being pushed onto people is the need for better hygiene and to be more health-conscious during this period. This leads to people staying away from clinics/hospitals unless absolutely necessary. For minor ailments, most would typically be able to self-medicate at home. With many workplaces closed, the need for an MC (and hence a visit to the doctors) is also greatly reduced.

3. Deferral of less urgent services
On 6 April, the Ministry of Health in Singapore issued guidance that all non-essential medical services should be deferred in line with the Circuit Breaker in Singapore. Additionally, services suitable for teleconsultation should be delivered remotely. This was aimed at focusing healthcare resources towards combating the spread of Covid-19.

4. The dearth of medical tourists
Similarly, in end Mar, the MOH sent out a memo to practitioners to immediately stop of defer accepting foreign patients who do not reside in Singapore. Current foreign patients were also advised to continue seeking medical treatment in their home countries. This move greatly cut off medical tourism, which forms a sizable portion of private hospital revenues.

On the flip side, non-hospital/clinic-related healthcare stocks have done well. In particular glove makers like Riverstone and UG Healthcare have almost doubled since a year ago. This is because of a confluence of factors that I would be addressing in my next post so stay tuned!
Performance of other healthcare stocks (Source: Yahoo Finance)

Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
1 comments
The Covid-19 outbreak has thrown businesses and investors into a frenzy thinking about the long term viability of their business models. Inherent in all the crystal-ball-ing that everyone is trying to do is to address the question of what life post-Covid will be like. Without knowing that answer, businesses have to make reasonable guesses and try to balance the interests of multiple stakeholders. 

As the 1Q20 earnings season in Singapore comes to a close, I noticed that most analysts have identified the duration and severity of the Covid-19 virus as a key catalyst for share prices. While I believe that this is true, I think it is also important to focus on how managements are balancing various priorities and how this sets them up to take advantage of the catalyst aforementioned. My article will attempt to identify some of these balancing acts that companies have to do and give examples of companies that have gone both ways. 

Covid19 has caused the closure of borders and the disruption of supply chains globally. Where goods used to freely move across borders, we are now seeing countries restricting outflow of goods for their own national stockpile. Similarly, companies face supply disruptions. 

Taking the example of a supermarket chain, when there was panic buying they were faced with a short supply of goods to sell to consumers. Typically, supermarkets would have estimated consumer demand and kept a small amount of stock in warehouses; this was to reduce the cost of storage and ensure that consumers always receive the freshest goods. However, due to the demand spike, supermarkets have had to grapple with the following decision

1. Built-in redundancies
2. Diversity of supplies
3. Localization/control of supplies

1. Built-in redundancies
By keeping additional stock in the warehouse, supermarkets would have the spare capacity to meet demand spikes. While it is possible to let this 'demand' go unsatisfied, it could be detrimental in the long run if consumers decide to go to a competitor and stick with that competitor. Psychologically, there could be the thought that the competitor is better as he was able to meet the consumer's needs during times of crisis and hence invoke a greater sense of customer loyalty. 

On the flip side, having additional stock or some built-in redundancies like extra manpower to stock goods or be cashiers can lead to additional costs that businesses have to bear. For a supermarket that also sells perishables, the freshness of produce is an important factor. The larger amount of stock that supermarkets hold may also be at risk of expiry/spoilage if demand tapers off more than expected. As of 1Q20, Sheng Siong Group reported a quarterly net profit margin of 8.8%. Increases in warehousing and logistics costs as a result of the redundancies would eat into already-thin margins. 

2. Diversity of supplies
During multiple interviews/briefings, Singapore's Minister for Trade and Industry highlighted that Singapore has a diversified set of food suppliers and that would help reduce the risk of shelves going empty. Similarly, supermarkets would do well to ensure they have goods sourced from multiple suppliers instead of just one for risk management purposes. In the event there is a disruption from one supplier, at least the other supplier can pick up some slack. There is also the added benefit of having a greater selection of goods for consumers. 

However, businesses have to balance how diversified they want their suppliers to be as this can often drive up costs and take up a significant amount of manpower to manage multiple relationships. Supermarkets may find that ordering 100% of their apples from 1 supplier may allow them to achieve a lower cost price due to bulk discounts. 

3. Localization or control of supplies
Another point that is frequently highlighted is the need for localization of supplies. In Singapore, >90% of our food supplies are foreign-sourced, making us more vulnerable to trade shutdowns. Therefore the Singapore Food Agency has come up with a goal to have 30% of our food produced locally by 2030. Similarly for supermarkets, they may wish to have greater control over the value chain by diversifying upwards into having more house brands or their own supply chains. 

Apart from cost considerations, the shift into another business model (albeit complementary) may dilute the management time and focus on its core business. 

Due to the uncertain nature of the Covid-19 virus and varying nature of different business models, companies have to weigh the cost and benefits of tilting the balance for their operations. Importantly, company managements need to have a thorough understanding of their own strengths and weakness as well as the opportunities and threats of their industry. 
Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments
What happened?
MSCI announced the outcome of their semi-annual review for the MSCI Singapore Index. This will result in Mapletree Logistics Trust (MLT) being added to the index on May 29 while the following 4 stocks will be removed
  1. ComfortDelgro (CDG)
  2. SATS
  3. SPH
  4. Sembcorp Industries (SCI)

There was also a change in the MSCI Singapore small caps index as the following stocks were added
  1. AIMS APAC REIT
  2. Ascendas India Trust
  3. Cromwell European REIT
  4. Keppel Pacific Oak REIT
  5. Lendlease Global REIT

What is the MSCI Singapore?
It is another index just like the STI to track the performance of the broader (large and mid cap) market of the Singapore stock exchange. As of Apr20 it had 25 constituents and represents about 85% of the whole market's free-float adjusted market cap. Although the constituents are not fully readily available, readers may wish to compare the Top 10 snapshot provided by MSCI with my previous post on the expected change in the STI where I also posted a Top 10 constituents list. 
MSCI Singapore Top 10 Constituents (Source: MSCI Apr2020)

While the STI has ETFs traded on the SGX market, the MSCI index also has an iShares MSCI Singapore traded on the New York Stock Exchange. This provides it with greater access to liquidity as the US market is the deepest and most well-traded market in the world. 

Expected impact
As mentioned in the previous post about the STI, newly added stocks tend to trade higher in the lead up to the cut-in date (29 May) and slightly after the date as passive index funds that track the index would have to start adding the stock to their portfolios. The opposite holds for newly cut out stocks as funds sell off their positions. The impact is likely to be larger for MSCI Singapore compared to the MSCI Singapore small cap index due to the size of the passive index funds tracking them and the relatively smaller number of constituents in the MSCI Singapore. 

For investors who wish to capitalize on the rebalancing, MLT should be at the top of their shopping list. However, would be prudent to note that as passive funds flow in, this could drive valuations up more than necessary and lead to some profit-taking after the rebalancing is complete. Vice versa for the stocks that are removed, if the selling is overdone, there could be some value in CDG, SATS, SCI and SPH. 

Happy investing! 
Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
3 comments
Definition
The idea of kitchen sinking is to release bad news at the same time rather than 'spreading' out such announcements over an extended period of time. With all the bad news coming at the same time, companies may also take the chance to take a 'big bath', which is an earnings management technique where earnings are made to look worse than they are. While kitchen sinking is wrong per se, taking a big bath pushes beyond the boundaries of accounting subjectivity and is unethical.

Why now
1. Earnings forecast going to be revised lower anyway so might as well lower expectations more so make future years easier
2. Analysts/market going to write-off 2020 performance and focus on recovery
3. Drive down stock price for management to buy before the recovery; moral hazard due to information asymmetry as management knows things are not as bad as reported

Areas to look out for
1. Write-offs/Impairments/Provisions (banks' loan loss provisions on expected credit loss)
2. Delayed revenue recognition
3. Prepaid expenses

Full impact of Covid19 will take a while to materialize as the second and third order impacts start to come in the coming quarters. When it comes, firms have the opportunity to kitchen sink/take a big bath to lump as much bad news as possible together such that earnings forecasts are lower. During this period, there could be another leg of a downward adjustment for stock prices as the market prices in the new (and lower forecasts). My argument is that this would over-account for the bad news (assuming no huge 2nd wave of Covid-19) and that this would be the best time to enter the market.

Apart from managing earnings, kitchen sinking and taking a Big Bath also can help companies to manage expectations. Generally, company managements would want to ensure that they are able to meet or exceed earnings benchmarks set by analysts' consensus in order to build credibility with capital markets and lower uncertainty about future prospects. From a valuation perspective, the lower the uncertainty/risk associated with the stock, the lower the discounting and the higher the valuation.

Overall, when investors analyze companies, especially during these times, they should be careful about what is presented and evaluate information based on their own expectations of reality. For example, if a retail REIT reports higher yoy profitability, dig deeper into the reasons! I believe that doing their own analysis will help investors to develop their own framework upon which to analyze companies. Happy investing!
Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments
On 6 May 2020, the Ministry of National Development announced temporary relief measures to support the overall property market with both developers and homeowners getting help.

Measures
  1. Extension of the Project Completion Period by 6 months for residential, commercial and industrial development projects 
  2. Extension of the commencement and completion of residential development and sale of housing units in residential developments relating to the remission of the ABSD by 6 months
  3. Extension of the PCP and/or disposal period by up to a total of 6 months for residential development projects under the QC regime for foreign housing developers
  4. Extension of time by 6 months for the sale of 1st residential property relating to the ABSD remission for the 2nd residential property for a Singaporean married couple (at least 1 Singapore Citizen)
Impact on developers
Understandably this is a slight positive for developers given that construction sites and show-flats have to be closed during the circuit breaker period. For development projects, even when construction sites reopen, it is likely that the pace of work would be greatly reduced due to the safe distancing measures and other additional measures involved. Hence the new measures help to mitigate the impact of the delays. 

Developers acquiring sites after Jul 2018 are subject to 30% ABSD of which 25% may be remitted. For the ABSD remission, developers used to have 2 timelines to meet. Firstly it had to commence development within 2 years of the purchase of land. Next, it had to complete and sell all housing units within 5 years from the purchase of land in order to qualify for ABSD remission. This was meant to prevent developers from accumulating land bank and thus having implicit control of the new home supply. From a developers point of view, this was rather punitive as the ABSD would be on the full value of the land rather than the proportion of unsold units. This thus highly discouraged land banking. With show-flats closed and buyers having to stay at home, home sales have plunged. April 2020 registered just 293 transactions, the lowest in the past few years. Developers approaching the 5-year mark and have unsold units would be panicking slightly; these fears can now be pushed back for another 6 months.
Monthly New Home Sales (Source: URA Realis - 9 May 2020)
Impact on home owners
The new measures would help improve the holding power of home owners and hence I don't expect to see any significant decline in home prices in the short-run. With jobs secure for now and interest rates low, home owners can afford to hold on to their selling prices and wait out this downturn. For now, HDB resale transactions have been relatively stable. 

Before the new relief measures, a Singaporean married couple purchasing their 2nd residential property would have to sell their 1st residential property within 6 months after the date of the purchase of the 2nd property (if it is a completed property) or 6 months after the TOP if the 2nd property was uncompleted. Without the relief measures, it would have been likely that homeowners could have lowered their asking prices in order to meet the timeline. This is especially important in 2020 where there is a record number of HDB flats hitting their 5-year Minimum Occupation Period (MOP). Typically when flats hit their MOP, there would be home owners who wish to upgrade to a larger flat or private property and these HDB upgrades would then drive transaction volumes. 

HDB Resale Transactions (Source: HDB)
Impact on the property market and home prices
While this is positive for the residential property market, readers have to be mindful that the prevailing sentiment was negative (ie. low base); this news probably upgrades the sentiment to neutral. From the supply side there is a large number of launches and older launches now given peak completions in 2022/23 as the typical waiting period after launch is around 3 years. Developers, being aware of the competition in the market, are likely to price developments competitively, thus preventing prices from increasing too much. 
Pipeline supply of residential units (Source: URA)
On the demand side, the impending recession will force many households to reevaluate their property purchase plans. Potential HDB upgraders could become more cautious and wait out the uncertainties before committing to a new purchase. In the luxury market, foreign demand is likely to come down as a result of travel bans. Additionally, business owners may choose to cash in on some investment properties in order to ensure sufficient cashflow for their businesses to stay afloat. I further believe that in the mid-term demand will crumble even more as relief measures expire, businesses start to close and employment comes down. 

Overall, the outlook is going to be short-term neutral, mid-term slightly negative. However, looking at the historical URA PPI, each trough is higher than the previous trough so there is still some hope for the future, just not so soon. 
URA Property Price Index (Source: 99.co)

Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments
I recently got notified by Feedspot that my blog would be included in the Top 75 Singapore Investment Blogs. While I have heard of some of the top few blogs, the list reminded me again that the community interested in personal finance and investments is pretty large in Singapore. I first got interested in the markets during the 2008 GFC, back then I was still in high school and started using a simulator on Investopedia to trade. Later on in JC, I took this interest in financial literacy further by having my Project Work (PW) centred around it. 

My blog was started for 2 complementary reasons:
1. Diary - After having been interested in investing for almost 10 years, I realized that a lot of what I learnt from attending investment talks and analyst briefings were not recorded down properly. As a result, I was not able to fully grasp or remember some of the learning points. Every now and then when the same concept is brought up, somehow it seemed like I was learning it all over again. 

2. Education - Rounding back to my PW project on financial literacy, the project showed me (and my groupmates) that there was a gap in financial literacy education that formal education did not address. I hope that my blog will be a part of the many resources that readers have to improve their financial literacy. Through my posts, I also do hope that readers would be able to get better insights into how the market works and what drives businesses. As I may not always be correct, I do hope that the comments section can be better utilized by readers who have suggestions for improvement or an alternative view. 

Since inception in mid-March 2020, I have done 14 posts (excluding this post) about 8,000 page views with multiple posts getting past the 1,000 view mark. Interestingly the distribution of views was different from what I expected; some of my better posts (in my opinion) received lower views than posts I spent less effort for. Also, I started receiving more page views after submitting my blog to be on aggregator sites like sginvestbloggers and thefinance so a shout out to the guys running those sites. 

To end off, I am appreciative of the support from readers (whoever you are) for my blog and wish everyone good luck in the markets!
Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
No comments
The age-old debate between active and passive investing hinges on the efficient market hypothesis (EMH); this is where asset prices reflect all information and consistent outperformance on a risk-adjusted basis (alpha) is not possible. This is then split into 3 main forms of EMH
  1. Weak form - This suggests that stock prices reflect past pricing data and that technical analysis cannot be used to generate consistent risk-adjusted outperformance. On the other hand, fundamental analysis could be used to find under or overvalued stocks. 
  2. Semi-strong form - This suggests that all public information is reflected in a stock's price and neither technical nor fundamental analysis can be used to achieve alpha. Private information can be used to generate alpha. 
  3. Strong form - This suggests that all information (public and private) is reflected in a stock's current price and there is no way to achieve returns greater than the market return.
Along the spectrum of the types of market efficiencies, I probably lie somewhere between weak and semi-strong form. In general, I believe that prices reflect most of the public information especially for larger more liquid stocks but there are some exceptions I would like to highlight below.

1. Lack of analyst coverage
Companies which are less well-covered by stock analysts could be mispriced in the market as a result of the lack of public and private information flowing through to the market price. The lack of analyst interest could stem from the low trading volume, implying a lower amount of trading commissions can be earned from transactions in the stock. Even as such companies release information, there may be insufficient market participants and fund flows to correctly price the stock.

2. Lack of liquidity
The gradual shift towards passive investing could also lead to a bifurcation between index-linked/ETF-tracked stocks and smaller, less-liquid stocks that fall through the cracks. Such small-mid cap stocks could potentially be mispriced as a result of the low liquidity. The reason for this exception is also quite similar to the one above where the lack of liquidity prevents the stock from finding an 'equilibrium'/correct market price.

3. Imperfect flow of information
For developing market economies where disclosure standards are less stringent compared to the US, the ability to extract alpha from equity investments highly depends on the amount of research and work put in by the fund manager. An example could be channel checks, where the fund manager speaks directly to the management of companies they invest in and also their industry peers. On the SGX, one example would be Eagle Hospitality Trust, which did not disclose certain interested party transactions as a result of the lack of such requirements.

MAS and SGX were aware of such issues plaguing small-mid cap firms and hence launched the Grant for Equity Markets Singapore (GEMS) to help enhance coverage of small-mid cap stocks as well as to help defray some of the listing costs. It was hoped that more research coverage would lead to greater awareness about certain stocks and in turn lead to greater trading liquidity and hence a more efficient market.

For investors, the inefficiencies could imply that there are opportunities for alpha generation, especially for smaller and less liquid stocks. However, due to the nature of such stocks, there may also be less information available publicly hence a high level of due diligence is required before taking the plunge. As the saying goes, high risk high return.

Some stocks I am keeping track of are: Uni-Asia, Centurion, BRC, HRNet, PropNex, Fuyu
Share
Tweet
Pin
Share
1 comments
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Popular Posts

  • MSCI Singapore Index rebalancing impact on stocks
  • Office REITs results round up: WFH a boon or bane?
  • 3 key concerns REIT investors should take note of

Tags

  • Centurion Corp
  • Consumer
  • Covid-19
  • Coworking
  • Eagle Hospitality Trust
  • Gloves
  • Healthcare
  • Index
  • Property
  • REITs
  • Sembcorp
  • SPH REIT
  • Supermarket

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2021 (3)
    • ▼  6 Jun - 13 Jun (1)
      • ARA Logos Logistics Trust: 3 reasons to drive a re...
    • ►  21 Feb - 28 Feb (1)
    • ►  24 Jan - 31 Jan (1)
  • ►  2020 (43)
    • ►  30 Aug - 6 Sep (1)
    • ►  23 Aug - 30 Aug (1)
    • ►  9 Aug - 16 Aug (1)
    • ►  2 Aug - 9 Aug (2)
    • ►  26 Jul - 2 Aug (2)
    • ►  19 Jul - 26 Jul (2)
    • ►  12 Jul - 19 Jul (2)
    • ►  28 Jun - 5 Jul (2)
    • ►  21 Jun - 28 Jun (2)
    • ►  14 Jun - 21 Jun (2)
    • ►  7 Jun - 14 Jun (2)
    • ►  31 May - 7 Jun (1)
    • ►  24 May - 31 May (3)
    • ►  17 May - 24 May (1)
    • ►  10 May - 17 May (3)
    • ►  3 May - 10 May (2)
    • ►  26 Apr - 3 May (3)
    • ►  19 Apr - 26 Apr (1)
    • ►  12 Apr - 19 Apr (2)
    • ►  5 Apr - 12 Apr (2)
    • ►  29 Mar - 5 Apr (2)
    • ►  22 Mar - 29 Mar (2)
    • ►  15 Mar - 22 Mar (2)

Created with by ThemeXpose